Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 513-523.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7048 513
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Guang CHU, Tingting CHEN, Song CHEN, Chunmei XU, Danying WANG, Xiufu ZHANG*()
Received:
2017-04-28
Revised:
2017-06-10
Online:
2017-10-10
Published:
2017-09-10
Contact:
Xiufu ZHANG
通讯作者:
章秀福
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Guang CHU, Tingting CHEN, Song CHEN, Chunmei XU, Danying WANG, Xiufu ZHANG. Effects of Interaction Between Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Rates on Rice Yield and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(5): 513-523.
褚光, 陈婷婷, 陈松, 徐春梅, 王丹英, 章秀福. 灌溉模式与施氮量交互作用对水稻产量以及水、氮利用效率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(5): 513-523.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7048 513
年度与处理 Year and treatment | 产量 Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 单位面积穗数 No.of panicles/(×104 hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||||
CI+LN | 7.34±0.22 d | 245.4±3.9 b | 143.2±2.5 d | 82.5±1.0 b | 25.4±0.3 a |
CI+MN | 8.53±0.23 b | 284.2±5.5 a | 150.8±1.8 c | 78.9±1.2 c | 25.2±0.2 ab |
CI+HN | 8.12±0.15 c | 286.4±5.3 a | 156.2±2.3 b | 72.5±1.3 d | 25.1±0.2 b |
AWD+LN | 8.06±0.20 c | 243.5±4.1 b | 146.3±2.1 d | 89.1±1.5 a | 25.5±0.2 a |
AWD+MN | 9.20±0.26 a | 279.9±5.5 a | 154.9±3.1 b | 83.5±1.0 b | 25.4±0.2 a |
AWD+HN | 9.03±0.28 a | 282.5±4.9 a | 162.4±2.6 a | 78.1±1.8 c | 25.3±0.2 ab |
2016 | |||||
CI+LN | 7.18±0.12 e | 224.4±3.8 b | 150.3±2.2 d | 84.8±1.0 bc | 25.2±0.4 a |
CI+MN | 8.83±0.20 b | 274.2±4.8 a | 155.2±2.7 c | 82.8±0.8 c | 25.1±0.2 a |
CI+HN | 8.40±0.18 c | 272.9±5.2 a | 162.3±3.7 ab | 75.4±1.5 d | 25.2±0.1 a |
AWD+LN | 7.78±0.24 d | 225.3±4.2 b | 153.8±4.2 c | 88.7±0.9 a | 25.3±0.2 a |
AWD+MN | 9.38±0.21 a | 270.8±3.5 a | 160.2±1.6 b | 85.8±1.1 b | 25.2±0.3 a |
AWD+HN | 9.27±0.29 a | 270.5±4.4 a | 164.2±2.1 a | 83.1±1.4 c | 25.2±0.2 a |
Table 1 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on grain its and its components.
年度与处理 Year and treatment | 产量 Grain yield/(t·hm-2) | 单位面积穗数 No.of panicles/(×104 hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||||
CI+LN | 7.34±0.22 d | 245.4±3.9 b | 143.2±2.5 d | 82.5±1.0 b | 25.4±0.3 a |
CI+MN | 8.53±0.23 b | 284.2±5.5 a | 150.8±1.8 c | 78.9±1.2 c | 25.2±0.2 ab |
CI+HN | 8.12±0.15 c | 286.4±5.3 a | 156.2±2.3 b | 72.5±1.3 d | 25.1±0.2 b |
AWD+LN | 8.06±0.20 c | 243.5±4.1 b | 146.3±2.1 d | 89.1±1.5 a | 25.5±0.2 a |
AWD+MN | 9.20±0.26 a | 279.9±5.5 a | 154.9±3.1 b | 83.5±1.0 b | 25.4±0.2 a |
AWD+HN | 9.03±0.28 a | 282.5±4.9 a | 162.4±2.6 a | 78.1±1.8 c | 25.3±0.2 ab |
2016 | |||||
CI+LN | 7.18±0.12 e | 224.4±3.8 b | 150.3±2.2 d | 84.8±1.0 bc | 25.2±0.4 a |
CI+MN | 8.83±0.20 b | 274.2±4.8 a | 155.2±2.7 c | 82.8±0.8 c | 25.1±0.2 a |
CI+HN | 8.40±0.18 c | 272.9±5.2 a | 162.3±3.7 ab | 75.4±1.5 d | 25.2±0.1 a |
AWD+LN | 7.78±0.24 d | 225.3±4.2 b | 153.8±4.2 c | 88.7±0.9 a | 25.3±0.2 a |
AWD+MN | 9.38±0.21 a | 270.8±3.5 a | 160.2±1.6 b | 85.8±1.1 b | 25.2±0.3 a |
AWD+HN | 9.27±0.29 a | 270.5±4.4 a | 164.2±2.1 a | 83.1±1.4 c | 25.2±0.2 a |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 植株吸氮量 N uptake of plants/(kg·hm-2) | 籽粒吸氮量 N uptake of grains/(kg·hm-2) | 产谷利用效率 IEN/(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN/(kg·kg-1) | 氮收获指数 HIN/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||||
CI+LN | 106.2±4.5 c | 66.7±2.2 d | 69.5±2.5 b | 91.8±3.2 b | 63.1±1.1 b |
CI+MN | 134.8±3.2 b | 82.0±1.8 b | 63.2±3.3 c | 53.3±1.8 d | 60.8±0.8 c |
CI+HN | 140.8±4.7 a | 76.1±3.0 c | 57.4±1.8 d | 33.8±1.9 f | 53.8±0.5 d |
AWD+LN | 109.3±5.1 c | 73.7±2.4 c | 73.8±2.3 a | 100.8±2.1 a | 67.5±0.9 a |
AWD+MN | 132.4±3.0 b | 86.0±1.9 a | 69.7±3.0 b | 57.5±2.5 c | 65.1±0.9 ab |
AWD+HN | 140.2±3.3 a | 86.3±1.5 a | 64.5±2.8 c | 37.6±1.5 e | 61.7±1.3 bc |
2016 | |||||
CI+LN | 108.4±4.2 c | 66.1±3.2 d | 66.7±2.4 bc | 89.8±1.8 b | 61.8±1.2 bc |
CI+MN | 136.9±3.4 b | 79.4±1.8 b | 64.5±2.1 c | 55.2±2.2 d | 58.0±1.0 c |
CI+HN | 138.7±2. 9 ab | 73.1±1.7 c | 60.5±1.4 d | 35.0±1.6 f | 52.6±0.8 d |
AWD+LN | 110.4±3.3 c | 75.0±2.3 bc | 70.9±1.7 a | 97.2±2.4 a | 68.4±0.8 a |
AWD+MN | 140.2±4.8 ab | 88.0±2.4 a | 67.2±2.1 b | 58.6±1.4 c | 63.1±0.9 b |
AWD+HN | 144.3±3.5 a | 87.4±1.9 a | 63.5±2.3 c | 38.6±1.3 e | 60.8±0.7 c |
Table 2 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on nitrogen use efficiency of rice.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 植株吸氮量 N uptake of plants/(kg·hm-2) | 籽粒吸氮量 N uptake of grains/(kg·hm-2) | 产谷利用效率 IEN/(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN/(kg·kg-1) | 氮收获指数 HIN/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||||
CI+LN | 106.2±4.5 c | 66.7±2.2 d | 69.5±2.5 b | 91.8±3.2 b | 63.1±1.1 b |
CI+MN | 134.8±3.2 b | 82.0±1.8 b | 63.2±3.3 c | 53.3±1.8 d | 60.8±0.8 c |
CI+HN | 140.8±4.7 a | 76.1±3.0 c | 57.4±1.8 d | 33.8±1.9 f | 53.8±0.5 d |
AWD+LN | 109.3±5.1 c | 73.7±2.4 c | 73.8±2.3 a | 100.8±2.1 a | 67.5±0.9 a |
AWD+MN | 132.4±3.0 b | 86.0±1.9 a | 69.7±3.0 b | 57.5±2.5 c | 65.1±0.9 ab |
AWD+HN | 140.2±3.3 a | 86.3±1.5 a | 64.5±2.8 c | 37.6±1.5 e | 61.7±1.3 bc |
2016 | |||||
CI+LN | 108.4±4.2 c | 66.1±3.2 d | 66.7±2.4 bc | 89.8±1.8 b | 61.8±1.2 bc |
CI+MN | 136.9±3.4 b | 79.4±1.8 b | 64.5±2.1 c | 55.2±2.2 d | 58.0±1.0 c |
CI+HN | 138.7±2. 9 ab | 73.1±1.7 c | 60.5±1.4 d | 35.0±1.6 f | 52.6±0.8 d |
AWD+LN | 110.4±3.3 c | 75.0±2.3 bc | 70.9±1.7 a | 97.2±2.4 a | 68.4±0.8 a |
AWD+MN | 140.2±4.8 ab | 88.0±2.4 a | 67.2±2.1 b | 58.6±1.4 c | 63.1±0.9 b |
AWD+HN | 144.3±3.5 a | 87.4±1.9 a | 63.5±2.3 c | 38.6±1.3 e | 60.8±0.7 c |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 分蘖数 Number of tillers per m2 | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of productive tillers/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
2015 | ||||
CI+LN | 289.3±4.8 e | 198.4±3.2 b | 195.3±2.7 b | 67.5±1.0 d |
CI+MN | 356.2±6.6 b | 236.4±2.8 a | 234.2±3.6 a | 65.8±1.3 d |
CI+HN | 387.8±6.6 a | 237.8±4.2 a | 235.8±3.1 a | 60.9±3.5 e |
AWD+LN | 247.3±5.1 f | 195.2±2.6 b | 192.8±2.4 b | 78.2±2.0 a |
AWD+MN | 310.4±7.7 d | 234.8±2.0 a | 230.0±3.2 a | 74.1±1.6 b |
AWD+HN | 331.8±5.2 c | 236.4±3.3 a | 231.7±2.2 a | 69.8±1.2 c |
2016 | ||||
CI+LN | 248.7±5.4 e | 176.9±2.7 b | 174.2±3.2 b | 69.8±0.9 b |
CI+MN | 348.2±6.2 b | 227.8±3.3 a | 224.1±1.8 a | 64.3±1.9 c |
CI+HN | 376.8±4.6 a | 227.3±4.1 a | 223.4±2.2 a | 59.1±1.8 d |
AWD+LN | 225.4±6.4 f | 180.4±3.5 b | 175.2±2.0 b | 77.9±1.4 a |
AWD+MN | 294.0±7.3 d | 224.8±2.8 a | 220.8±1.9 a | 75.1±2.1 a |
AWD+HN | 306.6±5.3 c | 224.3±4.1 a | 219.7±2.4 a | 71.7±1.6 b |
Table 3 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on number of tillers and percentage of productive tillers of rice.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 分蘖数 Number of tillers per m2 | 分蘖成穗率 Percentage of productive tillers/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
2015 | ||||
CI+LN | 289.3±4.8 e | 198.4±3.2 b | 195.3±2.7 b | 67.5±1.0 d |
CI+MN | 356.2±6.6 b | 236.4±2.8 a | 234.2±3.6 a | 65.8±1.3 d |
CI+HN | 387.8±6.6 a | 237.8±4.2 a | 235.8±3.1 a | 60.9±3.5 e |
AWD+LN | 247.3±5.1 f | 195.2±2.6 b | 192.8±2.4 b | 78.2±2.0 a |
AWD+MN | 310.4±7.7 d | 234.8±2.0 a | 230.0±3.2 a | 74.1±1.6 b |
AWD+HN | 331.8±5.2 c | 236.4±3.3 a | 231.7±2.2 a | 69.8±1.2 c |
2016 | ||||
CI+LN | 248.7±5.4 e | 176.9±2.7 b | 174.2±3.2 b | 69.8±0.9 b |
CI+MN | 348.2±6.2 b | 227.8±3.3 a | 224.1±1.8 a | 64.3±1.9 c |
CI+HN | 376.8±4.6 a | 227.3±4.1 a | 223.4±2.2 a | 59.1±1.8 d |
AWD+LN | 225.4±6.4 f | 180.4±3.5 b | 175.2±2.0 b | 77.9±1.4 a |
AWD+MN | 294.0±7.3 d | 224.8±2.8 a | 220.8±1.9 a | 75.1±2.1 a |
AWD+HN | 306.6±5.3 c | 224.3±4.1 a | 219.7±2.4 a | 71.7±1.6 b |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity |
---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||
CI+LN | 4.23±0.15 d | 6.12±0.13 d | 0.75±0.11 f |
CI+MN | 5.72±0.13 b | 7.44±0.27 bc | 1.69±0.08 c |
CI+HN | 6.12±0.19 a | 8.05±0.28 a | 1.31±0.09 d |
AWD+LN | 3.98±0.24 e | 6.04±0.17 d | 1.05±0.10 e |
AWD+MN | 5.14±0.15 c | 7.25±0.15 c | 1.94±0.05 b |
AWD+HN | 5.84±0.28 ab | 7.64±0.20 b | 2.16±0.06 a |
2016 | |||
CI+LN | 4.45±0.19 c | 6.31±0.21 d | 0.84±0.15 e |
CI+MN | 5.51±0.32 b | 7.61±0.12 b | 1.52±0.06 c |
CI+HN | 6.27±0.28 a | 7.94±0.22 a | 1.21±0.09 d |
AWD+LN | 4.09±0.17 d | 6.19±0.17 d | 1.04±0.11 de |
AWD+MN | 4.64±0.35 c | 7.17±0.23 c | 1.85±0.10 b |
AWD+HN | 5.69±0.26 b | 7.68±0.14 b | 2.04±0.08 a |
Table 4 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on LAI of rice.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity |
---|---|---|---|
2015 | |||
CI+LN | 4.23±0.15 d | 6.12±0.13 d | 0.75±0.11 f |
CI+MN | 5.72±0.13 b | 7.44±0.27 bc | 1.69±0.08 c |
CI+HN | 6.12±0.19 a | 8.05±0.28 a | 1.31±0.09 d |
AWD+LN | 3.98±0.24 e | 6.04±0.17 d | 1.05±0.10 e |
AWD+MN | 5.14±0.15 c | 7.25±0.15 c | 1.94±0.05 b |
AWD+HN | 5.84±0.28 ab | 7.64±0.20 b | 2.16±0.06 a |
2016 | |||
CI+LN | 4.45±0.19 c | 6.31±0.21 d | 0.84±0.15 e |
CI+MN | 5.51±0.32 b | 7.61±0.12 b | 1.52±0.06 c |
CI+HN | 6.27±0.28 a | 7.94±0.22 a | 1.21±0.09 d |
AWD+LN | 4.09±0.17 d | 6.19±0.17 d | 1.04±0.11 de |
AWD+MN | 4.64±0.35 c | 7.17±0.23 c | 1.85±0.10 b |
AWD+HN | 5.69±0.26 b | 7.68±0.14 b | 2.04±0.08 a |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 地上部干物质量Shoot dry weight/(t·hm-2) | 抽穗期根干质量Root dry weight at heading/(g·m-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 0~10 cm根层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10~20 cm根层 10-20 cm soil layer | ||||
2015 | ||||||||
CI+LN | 3.58±0.12 c | 8.27±0.38 d | 12.8±0.2 c | 66.0±2.9 b | 28.3±1.1 b | |||
CI+MN | 4.02±0.13 b | 9.54±0.22 b | 15.5±0.3 a | 76.4±2.5 a | 31.2±2.1 b | |||
CI+HN | 4.51±0.08 a | 10.10±0.31 a | 15.5±0.3 a | 75.3±3.2 a | 31.0±1.4 b | |||
AWD+LN | 3.43±0.09 c | 8.02±0.21 d | 13.2±0.3 b | 67.4±2.5 b | 36.3±0.9 ab | |||
AWD+MN | 3.97±0.15 b | 8.95±0.32 c | 15.4±0.2 a | 80.0±1.6 a | 39.3±2.0 a | |||
AWD+HN | 4.42±0.11 a | 9.46±0.25 b | 15.5±0.4 a | 79.4±2.2 a | 39.1±1.5 a | |||
2016 | ||||||||
CI+LN | 3.34±0.09 c | 8.45±0.26 d | 12.4±0.2 c | 60.7±1.2 c | 26.0±1.3 c | |||
CI+MN | 4.26±0.07 b | 9.85±0.29 b | 15.9±0.4 a | 72.1±2.7 a | 29.8±1.7 b | |||
CI+HN | 4.52±0.11 a | 10.20±0.16 a | 15.7±0.2 a | 73.8±2.9 a | 30.4±2.0 b | |||
AWD+LN | 3.28±0.14 c | 7.86±0.31 e | 13.0±0.2 b | 64.0±1.9 b | 34.4±1.6 ab | |||
AWD+MN | 4.12±0.07 b | 9.01±0.25 c | 15.7±0.3 a | 75.3±2.1 a | 37.1±0.9 a | |||
AWD+HN | 4.65±0.15 a | 9.75±0.20 b | 15.8±0.3 a | 75.1±3.2 a | 38.7±1.4 a |
Table 5 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on shoot dry weight and root dry weight at heading in rice.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 地上部干物质量Shoot dry weight/(t·hm-2) | 抽穗期根干质量Root dry weight at heading/(g·m-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 0~10 cm根层 0-10 cm soil layer | 10~20 cm根层 10-20 cm soil layer | ||||
2015 | ||||||||
CI+LN | 3.58±0.12 c | 8.27±0.38 d | 12.8±0.2 c | 66.0±2.9 b | 28.3±1.1 b | |||
CI+MN | 4.02±0.13 b | 9.54±0.22 b | 15.5±0.3 a | 76.4±2.5 a | 31.2±2.1 b | |||
CI+HN | 4.51±0.08 a | 10.10±0.31 a | 15.5±0.3 a | 75.3±3.2 a | 31.0±1.4 b | |||
AWD+LN | 3.43±0.09 c | 8.02±0.21 d | 13.2±0.3 b | 67.4±2.5 b | 36.3±0.9 ab | |||
AWD+MN | 3.97±0.15 b | 8.95±0.32 c | 15.4±0.2 a | 80.0±1.6 a | 39.3±2.0 a | |||
AWD+HN | 4.42±0.11 a | 9.46±0.25 b | 15.5±0.4 a | 79.4±2.2 a | 39.1±1.5 a | |||
2016 | ||||||||
CI+LN | 3.34±0.09 c | 8.45±0.26 d | 12.4±0.2 c | 60.7±1.2 c | 26.0±1.3 c | |||
CI+MN | 4.26±0.07 b | 9.85±0.29 b | 15.9±0.4 a | 72.1±2.7 a | 29.8±1.7 b | |||
CI+HN | 4.52±0.11 a | 10.20±0.16 a | 15.7±0.2 a | 73.8±2.9 a | 30.4±2.0 b | |||
AWD+LN | 3.28±0.14 c | 7.86±0.31 e | 13.0±0.2 b | 64.0±1.9 b | 34.4±1.6 ab | |||
AWD+MN | 4.12±0.07 b | 9.01±0.25 c | 15.7±0.3 a | 75.3±2.1 a | 37.1±0.9 a | |||
AWD+HN | 4.65±0.15 a | 9.75±0.20 b | 15.8±0.3 a | 75.1±3.2 a | 38.7±1.4 a |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 剑叶净光合速率 Leaf photosynthetic rate/(µmol·m-2 s-1) | 根系氧化力 Root oxidation activity/(µg·g-1 h-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | W1 | D2 | W2 | D1 | W1 | D2 | W2 | ||
2015 | |||||||||
CI+LN | 17.4±0.5 b | 16.9±0.5 c | 13.9±0.6 c | 13.6±0.7 e | 408.7±22.5 b | 414.3±19.5 d | 261.7±16.6 c | 254.3±21.9 d | |
CI+MN | 21.5±0.5 a | 21.0±0.5 b | 17.1±0.5 a | 16.6±0.6 c | 595.2±26.5 a | 587.3±14.6 b | 392.4±17.5 a | 379.8±15.5 b | |
CI+HN | 21.9±0.7 a | 21.7±0.4 b | 15.1±0.5 b | 15.0±0.5 d | 611.0±27.4 a | 599.7±27.8 b | 354.3±16.9 b | 336.8±17.6 c | |
AWD+LN | 16.9±0.5 b | 21.7±0.4 b | 13.6±0.7 c | 18.3±0.8 b | 398.8±31.2 b | 547.3±18.2 c | 270.3±23.5 c | 358.7±25.5 bc | |
AWD+MN | 20.7±0.5 a | 25.2±0.6 a | 16.8±0.7 a | 21.5±0.6 a | 589.7±19.4 a | 650.3±16.5 a | 403.8±13.4 a | 454.3±24.8 a | |
AWD+HN | 21.5±0.5 a | 25.3±0.6 a | 17.9±0.5 a | 22.6±0.5 a | 600.4±16.4 a | 665.7±13.4 a | 406.7±24.8 a | 486.8±19.7 a | |
2016 | |||||||||
CI+LN | 16.6±0.6 b | 17.1±0.5 c | 14.2±0.5 c | 13.8±0.6 e | 436.2±22.2 b | 420.3±16.9 d | 270.3±16.8 c | 251.8±25.5 d | |
CI+MN | 19.9±0.8 a | 20.2±0.6 b | 17.4±0.5 a | 17.3±0.7 c | 625.5±23.1 a | 608.3±19.5 b | 393.8±25.1 a | 388.7±21.3 b | |
CI+HN | 20.7±0.6 a | 21.3±0.8 b | 16.3±0.8 b | 15.1±0.8 d | 616.3±24.8 a | 624.4±15.5 b | 342.0±21.5 b | 348.4±15.1 c | |
AWD+LN | 16.1±0.5 b | 20.6±0.4 b | 13.8±0.8 c | 18.2±0.8 b | 418.3±24.5 b | 568.7±22.4 c | 260.3±24.6 c | 390.5±22.7 b | |
AWD+MN | 19.4±0.7 a | 24.5±0.6 a | 17.3±0.6 a | 21.2±0.5 a | 607.8±11.5 a | 658.7±12.8 a | 389.0±31.8 a | 454.2±27.9 a | |
AWD+HN | 20.2±0.5 a | 23.5±0.5 a | 18.3±0.8 a | 22.7±0.7 a | 625.3±19.8 a | 670.3±20.5 a | 403.8±22.7 a | 488.5±27.2 a |
Table 6 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf and root oxidation activity of rice during grain filling.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 剑叶净光合速率 Leaf photosynthetic rate/(µmol·m-2 s-1) | 根系氧化力 Root oxidation activity/(µg·g-1 h-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | W1 | D2 | W2 | D1 | W1 | D2 | W2 | ||
2015 | |||||||||
CI+LN | 17.4±0.5 b | 16.9±0.5 c | 13.9±0.6 c | 13.6±0.7 e | 408.7±22.5 b | 414.3±19.5 d | 261.7±16.6 c | 254.3±21.9 d | |
CI+MN | 21.5±0.5 a | 21.0±0.5 b | 17.1±0.5 a | 16.6±0.6 c | 595.2±26.5 a | 587.3±14.6 b | 392.4±17.5 a | 379.8±15.5 b | |
CI+HN | 21.9±0.7 a | 21.7±0.4 b | 15.1±0.5 b | 15.0±0.5 d | 611.0±27.4 a | 599.7±27.8 b | 354.3±16.9 b | 336.8±17.6 c | |
AWD+LN | 16.9±0.5 b | 21.7±0.4 b | 13.6±0.7 c | 18.3±0.8 b | 398.8±31.2 b | 547.3±18.2 c | 270.3±23.5 c | 358.7±25.5 bc | |
AWD+MN | 20.7±0.5 a | 25.2±0.6 a | 16.8±0.7 a | 21.5±0.6 a | 589.7±19.4 a | 650.3±16.5 a | 403.8±13.4 a | 454.3±24.8 a | |
AWD+HN | 21.5±0.5 a | 25.3±0.6 a | 17.9±0.5 a | 22.6±0.5 a | 600.4±16.4 a | 665.7±13.4 a | 406.7±24.8 a | 486.8±19.7 a | |
2016 | |||||||||
CI+LN | 16.6±0.6 b | 17.1±0.5 c | 14.2±0.5 c | 13.8±0.6 e | 436.2±22.2 b | 420.3±16.9 d | 270.3±16.8 c | 251.8±25.5 d | |
CI+MN | 19.9±0.8 a | 20.2±0.6 b | 17.4±0.5 a | 17.3±0.7 c | 625.5±23.1 a | 608.3±19.5 b | 393.8±25.1 a | 388.7±21.3 b | |
CI+HN | 20.7±0.6 a | 21.3±0.8 b | 16.3±0.8 b | 15.1±0.8 d | 616.3±24.8 a | 624.4±15.5 b | 342.0±21.5 b | 348.4±15.1 c | |
AWD+LN | 16.1±0.5 b | 20.6±0.4 b | 13.8±0.8 c | 18.2±0.8 b | 418.3±24.5 b | 568.7±22.4 c | 260.3±24.6 c | 390.5±22.7 b | |
AWD+MN | 19.4±0.7 a | 24.5±0.6 a | 17.3±0.6 a | 21.2±0.5 a | 607.8±11.5 a | 658.7±12.8 a | 389.0±31.8 a | 454.2±27.9 a | |
AWD+HN | 20.2±0.5 a | 23.5±0.5 a | 18.3±0.8 a | 22.7±0.7 a | 625.3±19.8 a | 670.3±20.5 a | 403.8±22.7 a | 488.5±27.2 a |
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 抽穗期NSC NSC at heading/(g·m-2) | 成熟期NSC NSC at maturity/(g·m-2) | NSC运转率 Remobilized NSC/% | NSC对产量贡献率 NSC contributed to grain yield /% |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | ||||
CI+LN | 202.3±4.41 c | 90.5±2.3 d | 55.3±1.4 b | 15.1±0.8 c |
CI+MN | 252.4±3.26 b | 131±1.8 b | 47.9±1.3 d | 14.0±0.5 c |
CI+HN | 257.1±3.83 b | 171±3.6 a | 33.4±2.7 e | 10.5±0.5 d |
AWD+LN | 207.3±5.16 c | 80.7±3.2 d | 61.5±2.2 a | 16.1±0.3 b |
AWD+MN | 257.8±6.88 b | 103±2.8 c | 60.2±3.0 a | 16.9±0.3 a |
AWD+HN | 284.3±3.42 a | 139±2.5 b | 51.2±2.9 c | 15.9±0.4 b |
2016 | ||||
CI+LN | 204.3±4.25 d | 91.7±3.2 d | 55.2±1.3 b | 15.8±0.5 b |
CI+MN | 254.3±3.19 c | 137±2.8 b | 46.2±1.9 c | 13.5±0.6 c |
CI+HN | 251.7±5.28 c | 175±3.6 a | 30.3±2.0 d | 9.32±0.7 d |
AWD+LN | 211.7±6.51 d | 81.1±5.2 d | 61.8±1.3 a | 16.8±0.6 a |
AWD+MN | 262.9±4.03 b | 107±2.8 c | 59.2±2.9 a | 16.6±0.5 a |
AWD+HN | 291.7±4.92 a | 135±4.3 b | 53.6±3.0 b | 16.9±0.6 a |
Table 7 Effects of interaction between irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on remobilization of non-structural carbohydrates(NSC) in culms and sheaths during grain filling.
年度与处理 Year and Treatment | 抽穗期NSC NSC at heading/(g·m-2) | 成熟期NSC NSC at maturity/(g·m-2) | NSC运转率 Remobilized NSC/% | NSC对产量贡献率 NSC contributed to grain yield /% |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | ||||
CI+LN | 202.3±4.41 c | 90.5±2.3 d | 55.3±1.4 b | 15.1±0.8 c |
CI+MN | 252.4±3.26 b | 131±1.8 b | 47.9±1.3 d | 14.0±0.5 c |
CI+HN | 257.1±3.83 b | 171±3.6 a | 33.4±2.7 e | 10.5±0.5 d |
AWD+LN | 207.3±5.16 c | 80.7±3.2 d | 61.5±2.2 a | 16.1±0.3 b |
AWD+MN | 257.8±6.88 b | 103±2.8 c | 60.2±3.0 a | 16.9±0.3 a |
AWD+HN | 284.3±3.42 a | 139±2.5 b | 51.2±2.9 c | 15.9±0.4 b |
2016 | ||||
CI+LN | 204.3±4.25 d | 91.7±3.2 d | 55.2±1.3 b | 15.8±0.5 b |
CI+MN | 254.3±3.19 c | 137±2.8 b | 46.2±1.9 c | 13.5±0.6 c |
CI+HN | 251.7±5.28 c | 175±3.6 a | 30.3±2.0 d | 9.32±0.7 d |
AWD+LN | 211.7±6.51 d | 81.1±5.2 d | 61.8±1.3 a | 16.8±0.6 a |
AWD+MN | 262.9±4.03 b | 107±2.8 c | 59.2±2.9 a | 16.6±0.5 a |
AWD+HN | 291.7±4.92 a | 135±4.3 b | 53.6±3.0 b | 16.9±0.6 a |
[1] | Fageria N.Plant tissue test for determination of optimum concentration and uptake of nitrogen at different growth stages in low land rice.Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2003, 34(1): 259-270. |
[2] | Belder P, Bouman B, Cabangon R, Guoan L, Quilang E, Li Y, Spiertz J, Tuong T.Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia.Agric Water Manag, 2004, 65(3): 193-210. |
[3] | Bouman B.A conceptual framework for the improvement of cropwater productivity at different spatial scales.Agric Syst, 2007, 93(3): 43-60. |
[4] | Borrell A, Garside A, Fukai S.Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semi-arid tropical environment.Field Crops Res, 1997, 52(3): 231-248. |
[5] | Carrijo D, Lundy M, Linquist B.Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis.Field Crops Res, 2017, 203(3): 173-180. |
[6] | FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical Databases, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, 2013. .[<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">2017-09 -05</date-in-citation>]. |
[7] | Peng S, Buresh R, Huang J, Zhong X, Zou Y, Yang J, Wang G, Liu Y, Tang Q, Cui K, Zhang F, Dobermann A.Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management: A review.Agron Sustain Dev, 2010, 30(3): 649-656. |
[8] | Ju X, Xing G, Chen X, Zhang S, Zhang L, Liu X, Cui Z, Yin B, Christiea P, Zhu Z, Zhang F.Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 2009, 106(19), 3041-3046. |
[9] | 杨建昌, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 不同土壤水分状况下氮素营养对水稻产量的影响及其生理机制的研究. 中国农业科学, 1996, 29(4): 58-66. |
Yang J C, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S.Effect of nitrogen nutrition on rice yield and its physiological mechanism under different status of soil moisture.Sci Agric Sin, 1996, 29(4): 58-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Cabangon R, Tuong T, Castillo E.Effect of irrigation method and N-fertilizer management on rice yield, water productivity and nutrient use efficiencies in typical lowland rice conditions in China.Paddy Water Environ, 2004, 2(4): 195-206. |
[11] | Sharma B, KarS, Cheema S. Yield, water use and nitrogen uptake for different water and N levels in winter wheat. Fert Res, 1990, 22(1):119-127. |
[12] | 杨建昌, 杜永, 刘辉. 长江下游稻麦周年超高产栽培途径与技术. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1611-1621. |
Yang J C, Du Y, Liu H.Cultivation approaches and techniques for annual super-high-yielding of rice and wheat in the lower reaches of Yangtze river. Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41(6): 1611-1621. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Chu G, Chen T, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice.Field Crops Res, 2014, 162(8): 108-119. |
[14] | Chu G, Wang Z, Zhang H, Liu L, Yang J, Zhang J.Alternate wetting and moderate drying increases rice yield and reduces methane emission in paddy field with wheat straw residue incorporation.Food and Energy Sec, 2015, 4(3): 238-254. |
[15] | 褚光, 展明飞, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(7): 1026-1036. |
Chu G, Zhan M F, Zhu K Y, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(7): 1026-1036. | |
[16] | Fu J, Huang Z, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.Pre-anthesis non-structural carbohydrate reserve in the stem enhances the sink strength of inferior spikelets during grain filling of rice.Field Crops Res, 2011, 123(2): 170-182. |
[17] | Zhang Z, Chu G, Liu L, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.Mid-season nitrogen application strategies for rice varieties differing in panicle size.Field Crops Res, 2013, 150: 9-18. |
[18] | Boyer J, Westgate M.Grain yields with limited water. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55(407): 2385-2349. |
[19] | Saini H, Westgate M.Reproductive development in grain crops during drought.Adv Agron, 2000, 68(2): 59-96. |
[20] | Yang J, Zhang J, Liu K, et al.Abscisic acid and ethylene interact in rice spikelets in response to water stress during meiosis.J Plant Growth Regul, 2007, 26(4): 318-328. |
[21] | Zhang H, Xue Y, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Sci, 2009, 49(6): 2246-2260. |
[22] | Takai T, Fukuta Y, Shirawa T, Horie T.Time-related mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling grain-filling in rice. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56, 2107-2118. |
[23] | Ramasamy S, Berge H, Purushothaman S.Yield formation in rice in response to drainage and nitrogen application,Field Crops Res, 1997, 51(1): 65-82. |
[24] | Ju C, Buresh R, Wang Z, Zhang H, Liu L, Yang J, Zhang J.Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application.Field Crops Res, 2015, 175: 47-55. |
[25] | Yang C, Yang L, Yang X, Zhu O.Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils.Agr Water Manag, 2004, 70(1): 67-81. |
[26] | Liu L, Chen T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang J, Zhang J.Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice.Field Crops Res, 2013, 154: 226-235. |
[27] | Xue Y, Duan H, Liu L, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J.An improved crop management increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in rice.Crop Sci, 2013, 53(1): 271-284. |
[28] | Vitousek P, Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Melillo J.Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 1997, 277(5325) : 494-499. |
[29] | Belder P, Spiertz J, Bouman B, Lu G, Tuong T.Nitrogen economy and water productivity of lowland rice under water-saving irrigation.Field Crops Res, 2005, 93(2): 169-185. |
[30] | 王绍华, 曹卫星, 丁艳锋, 田永超, 姜东. 水氮互作对水稻氮吸收与利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(4): 497-501. |
Wang S H, Cao W X, Ding Y F, Tian Y C, Jiang D.Interactions of water management and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2004, 37(4): 497-501. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||